It is outrageous that the wages are not high enough to get basic necessities for one person, let alone two people or a family. In Barabara Enrenreich 's "Nickel and Dimed", Enrenreich worked a variety of jobs in a variety of locations.Commonly, those who work jobs of low income, have little to no accommodations, and have their life situations out in the open are not treated with respect. Despite the lack of awareness of this type of poverty, I do feel that their arrangements are, unfortunately, not uncommon at all. Although her job as a maid in Maine was also strenuous, and despite the fact that she also had a second job, I believe that her experience in Florida was tougher on her because it was her first attempt at living this lifestyle. The lack of financial stability dealt them a horrid hand when pertaining to housing, food, necessities, health, and other important needs. Other types of favorable work duties would be good for employees, so they are not as tired throughout their shifts. Even though Barbara didn't hold to her original plan, she was still able to reveal her appeals clearly Ehrenreich explores the process of applications and the difficulties of being a low-wage worker in and outside the workplace The statistics in the author's novel were attention-grabbing of the cost of rent, food and necessities. Her good health, her means of transportation, and the fact that she did not have children in tow already set her apart from the prototypical low-wage single mother. The author spent a year of her life working several low paying jobs, and staying in low quality facilities.
First off, three rules: she was not allowed to fall back on skills derived from her usual work; she must take the highest-paying job offered to her and do her best to hold it; she must accept the cheapest housing she could find.
The problem is that she wound up, by her own admission, breaking all three of these rules in one way or another.
Hers was not a Marie Antoinette quest, not an effort to pretend. By having to dip into her emergency fund proves her point even more.These are not the words of a scientist; these are the words of a performer. She clearly proves the point that wages for low-wagworkers must be higher per hour in America. Her being white and a native English speaker led her to avoid certain locales—like New York and L. Barbara moved from Florida to Maine to Minnesota, working in the cheapest lodgings available and accepting work as a waitress, hotel maid, house cleaner, nursing home aide, and Wal-Mart salesperson The statistics in the author's novel were attention-grabbing of the cost of rent, food and necessities. Barbara cleaned her slate and started fresh at a new area. The lack of financial stability dealt them a horrid hand when pertaining to housing, food, necessities, health, and other important needs. The only jobs these people are qualified for are minimum wage jobs.
In doing so, I feel that the research, despite its flaws, succeeded in exploring the plight of the low-wage worker in our society at that time. Not all people with jobs are well off.
She also set some limits: she would always have a car, would never be homeless, and would never under any circumstances go hungry. These are not the words of a scientist; these are the words of a performer.Both Ehrenreich and Venkatesh take unique approaches to their analysis of poverty. As Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Nickel and Dimed, worked at minimum wage paying jobs and reported the hardships that people had to go through on a day-to-day basis. Some startling statements from Ehrenreich were based from her memory about people's appearances of attire, body shape, and facial features. As time has gone on, however, the American Dream dwindles to just a whisper of the past. First off, three rules: she was not allowed to fall back on skills derived from her usual work; she must take the highest-paying job offered to her and do her best to hold it; she must accept the cheapest housing she could find. The areas of Ehrenreich's novel that she captured good were explaining in clear, vivid, detail of her jobs. In , Barbara Ehrenreich decided to join them in part by the welfare claim, which promises that any job equals a better life. The ethical concern, however, is with her approach. Working in several jobs of hard manual labor is exhausting for the mind and body. People have to be able to support themselves or their families with a place to live, food and other necessities. But rather than just writing about it, she actually did it. Plenty of evidence supports this argument.